Forum

> > Off Topic > Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source
ForenübersichtOff Topic-ÜbersichtEinloggen, um zu antworten

Englisch Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

87 Antworten
Seite
Zum Anfang Vorherige 1 2 3 4 5 Nächste Zum Anfang

Umfrage Umfrage

Css or Cs2D

Nur registrierte Benutzer können abstimmen
CSS
14,29% (7)
CS2D
48,98% (24)
CS 1.6
10,20% (5)
Both
16,33% (8)
None
10,20% (5)
49 Stimmen abgegeben

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Zitieren
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
No! I dont think so. Example:
I think Minecraft (Bad Graphic) is much better then Crysis (Best Graphic of all) or other games.

Unfortunately i can't post a Double Face-palm image because it's against the rules.
Crysis 2 - First person Shooter.
Minecraft - Survival Sandbox.

Anything else to use as argument?

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

Bowlinghead
User Off Offline

Zitieren
user Mechanolith hat geschrieben
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
No! I dont think so. Example:
I think Minecraft (Bad Graphic) is much better then Crysis (Best Graphic of all) or other games.

Unfortunately i can't post a Double Face-palm image because it's against the rules.
Crysis 2 - First person Shooter.
Minecraft - Survival Sandbox.

Anything else to use as argument?


And? That are both games where you can have fun.
btw minecraft is an open world game
--------------------
user FlooD hat geschrieben
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
No! I dont think so. Example:
I think Minecraft (Bad Graphic) is much better then Crysis (Best Graphic of all) or other games.

like you've ever played crysis...

No, I dont but I saw trailer and gameplay (And much more) and I think the graphic is awesome, but I will never say "OMG! This Graphic is awesome! Thats the best game ever!".

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

FlooD
GAME BANNED Off Offline

Zitieren
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
user Mechanolith hat geschrieben
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
No! I dont think so. Example:
I think Minecraft (Bad Graphic) is much better then Crysis (Best Graphic of all) or other games.

Unfortunately i can't post a Double Face-palm image because it's against the rules.
Crysis 2 - First person Shooter.
Minecraft - Survival Sandbox.

Anything else to use as argument?


And? That are both games where you can have fun.
btw minecraft is an open world game
--------------------
user FlooD hat geschrieben
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
No! I dont think so. Example:
I think Minecraft (Bad Graphic) is much better then Crysis (Best Graphic of all) or other games.

like you've ever played crysis...

No, I dont but I saw trailer and gameplay (And much more) and I think the graphic is awesome, but I will never say "OMG! This Graphic is awesome! Thats the best game ever!".

well how can u say minecraft is better than crysis if u havent played both?

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

Fossil
User Off Offline

Zitieren
Graphics doesn't need to be that great. If your aiming to play realistic games or fps then graphcis is one of the important factors that makes it fun. If your playing non-realistic or something like that. For example mario, you don't need graphics to make a mario game.. I mean look at super mario 64 its still stand that test of time.

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

Erik963
BANNED Off Offline

Zitieren
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
No! I dont think so. Example:
I think Minecraft (Bad Graphic) is much better then Crysis (Best Graphic of all) or other games.


Well i got to say minecraft graphic is not that bad at all. graphic of minecraft is made purposadly. Graphic of minecraft is better than graphic of supermario or i dont know CS2D or game like that.


Zitat
Graphics doesn't need to be that great. If your aiming to play realistic games or fps then graphcis is one of the important factors that makes it fun. If your playing non-realistic or something like that. For example mario, you don't need graphics to make a mario game.. I mean look at super mario 64 its still stand that test of time.


I have to dissagree. Realitic games need good graphic. For example gta 4. Tell me if anybody would play it with san andreas graphic. I dont think so. Gta 4 is one of the most realistic games in the world, thanks to its physic and graphic.

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

made in Finland
User Off Offline

Zitieren
ascii games' graphics are only letters and i still consider some of them have better gameplay and (A LOT) more depth than any games with real graphics. but they are more difficult get into, due steep learning curve. in other words they are so complicated that most people lose patience

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

boyzinthewoodz
User Off Offline

Zitieren
user 0a hat geschrieben
user boyzinthewoodz hat geschrieben
Graphic makes you play
Gameplay makes you stay

wise words grandmaster

And so, you play CS2D always but never play CSS?
Stop acting. Everyone loves Counter Strike series because of gameplay and graphics.
And be sure that if there was no CS -> No CS2D


lol css. gameplay is in css like in all ego-shooter games..
i have enough of this boring shit. ive never seen something like cs2d and its a great game.
i have so many other games like css but stopped them after the first 10 minutes. all boring! well halo3 took me some hours but cs2d won :-p

alt mc

MeiS
User Off Offline

Zitieren
MINECRAFT ONLY

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

Yates
Reviewer Off Offline

Zitieren
user Seekay hat geschrieben
user Yates hat geschrieben
user Jela331 hat geschrieben
Graphic doesn't make the game

Wrong.

Wrong too.

You know nothing. Graphics make the game, minecraft wouldn't be good with great graphics, and MMORPG games would be shit without good graphics.
Graphics make the game, doesn't matter if they're poor or epic.

alt Re: Counter-Strike 2D or Counter-Strike: Source

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Zitieren
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
And? That are both games where you can have fun.
btw minecraft is an open world game


Dude, i feel so sorry for you.
user Bowlinghead hat geschrieben
And? Those are both games where you can have fun.
Btw, Minecraft is an open world game

It's called sandbox if you never heard of it.
Games can be compared since their genre is the same.
Like, comparing CS1.6 with CS:Source is viable, but using "there was no good graphics at 1999" is totally stupid, since both exist and have the same genre.

But comparing sandbox with shooters... damn, it's so ridiculous.

Graphics make the game of course, gameplay makes you keep playing the game.
When you are going to buy a game, what do you see on the game's box? Millions of reviews about it's gameplay or awesome images of it?



user Apache uwu hat geschrieben
It depends, since COD would be nothing without it's flare/bloom/reflections. [...] Graphics don't make the game.

You just contradicted yourself...
Zum Anfang Vorherige 1 2 3 4 5 Nächste Zum Anfang
Einloggen, um zu antwortenOff Topic-ÜbersichtForenübersicht