Forum

> > Off Topic > Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?
Forums overviewOff Topic overviewLog in to reply

English Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

76 replies
Page
To the start Previous 1 2 3 4 Next To the start

Poll Poll

Is it real?

Only registered users are allowed to vote
YES
61.11% (33)
NO
7.41% (4)
Maybe
16.67% (9)
I dont play COD
14.81% (8)
54 votes cast

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

halfire120
User Off Offline

Quote
I dont play COD but i play Halo:Reach i play Reach because its made for fun not realism. And DC is right COD is milked so much, but i guess thats what people want and endless series of milked crap and i dont care how many people buy it half those people are 13 year olds who think they can outwit the population of the world buy playing a game made for people 5 years older than they are.

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Fossil
User Off Offline

Quote
user Mechanolith has written
I must agree that old games were harder than actual ones, but they were totally bad made, retarded and laggy aim with no smooth, and thin enemies who was always facing to you, like... piece of painted paper.
that's because of the lack of technology they had then, but it wasw a hit in their time, because doing this was unheard before. Even contra wasn't for kids.

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

bezmolvie
User Off Offline

Quote
Not going to say either way to the argument from Don, other than I believe CoD is highly overrated. I don't think comparing a Single-Player based game such as Doom to a Multi-Player based game such as CoD is fair, not at all.

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Aythadis
User Off Offline

Quote
Modern Warfare 3, the same people that made Black Ops is making it... that right there says a lot. Never going to buy Black Ops, and never buying MW3. Call of Duty should quit and start fresh with a different series that doesn't involve the words Call or Duty in the title.

I personally like the older games. I find them to be way more fun, like Doom. Much more work was put into it than Black Ops, and was more open for how the player wanted to play, where Call of Duty, you only have one direction, the way they want you to go. Considering that there are still millions of people that still play and customize Doom (and I'm one of them), that says it is still one of the best games in existence.]

If you compare the graphics with any modern games, well no sh*t that newer games look better. They didn't have the technology back then to do the things today, (just like most people will say) but it all has to start somewhere! You can't pull out the most realistic engine from your ass from nothing.

old Be the weapon.

Cert
User Off Offline

Quote
The history of the game will be the same as the other games
So!
Crysis 2 ! Be the weapon,Be Strong,Be fast

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Fossil
User Off Offline

Quote
There's no need to fight over about old and new games. The past is past and it made good history. Now is the new generation and make history of its own. And till you know it you'l be tellin your grandhicldren about how the games of today used to be fun and better than the games in their generartion. Thern they will just keep on playing on tyheir hollow games or what so ever. So make this generation of gaming last, before its past.

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Fossil
User Off Offline

Quote


This just annoys me. Of course it would change, people would get bored easily. Think of the game Doom going on xbox but has the same style as its original version for the SNES. That's why they even changed mario 2. Also it's not fair to compare Doom to the Call of Duty series. Doom has a storyline of its own containing various monsters as your enemy. While the COD series is a realistic style FPS which bases it's storyline to real life wars between countries.

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Quake-Ranger
User Off Offline

Quote
You don't understand my point.
Call of Duty is no quality product, its cheap and quickly made, its more a simulation than a videogame.
Also, its short in SP gameplay (call of Duty was originally made for SP).
It's a shame. If you want to play soldier, play Battlefield.
Support developers who actually know how to make a good game.

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

SixxK
User Off Offline

Quote
user Quake-Ranger has written
You don't understand my point.
Call of Duty is no quality product, its cheap and quickly made, its more a simulation than a videogame.
Also, its short in SP gameplay (call of Duty was originally made for SP).
It's a shame. If you want to play soldier, play Battlefield.
Support developers who actually know how to make a good game.
what about duke nukem forever

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Aythadis
User Off Offline

Quote
user Fossil has written
This just annoys me. Of course it would change, people would get bored easily. Think of the game Doom going on xbox but has the same style as its original version for the SNES. That's why they even changed mario 2. Also it's not fair to compare Doom to the Call of Duty series. Doom has a storyline of its own containing various monsters as your enemy. While the COD series is a realistic style FPS which bases it's storyline to real life wars between countries.
This also annoys me that you compared it with the SNES version...

Call of Duty stories are too predictable for me, and a little far fetched... I pretty much just run and shoot through the games and (commenting on MW2) oh look, I got a knife in the chest, but its OK! I'm a superhero! I'll rip it out and throw it at the backstabber's face!

old Re: Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Real or not ?

Fossil
User Off Offline

Quote
user Aythadis has written
user Fossil has written
This just annoys me. Of course it would change, people would get bored easily. Think of the game Doom going on xbox but has the same style as its original version for the SNES. That's why they even changed mario 2. Also it's not fair to compare Doom to the Call of Duty series. Doom has a storyline of its own containing various monsters as your enemy. While the COD series is a realistic style FPS which bases it's storyline to real life wars between countries.
This also annoys me that you compared it with the SNES version...

Call of Duty stories are too predictable for me, and a little far fetched... I pretty much just run and shoot through the games and (commenting on MW2) oh look, I got a knife in the chest, but its OK! I'm a superhero! I'll rip it out and throw it at the backstabber's face!
. I know that mw2's campaign sucked but that doesn't mean all of the call of duty series would suck too. Besidesw what enemies do you expect in wars between countries? A two headed bull monster? So you can't really compare it to that. You should comparer it to somethting like halo or half life. Heck you should even compare it to cs:zero.
To the start Previous 1 2 3 4 Next To the start
Log in to replyOff Topic overviewForums overview