Forum
Off Topic Creation or Evolution? Leiche has written
Atheism is not a religion, Atheism is a rejection of religious beliefs.
What Buddhism is then? Buddhism is an atheist religion. It's the belief that meditation and good living can break the cycle of reincarnation and result in enlightenment. I said atheist religion because it dosen't have any god. Buddha was an sage that founded Buddhism. And that isn't the definition of a god;
The concept of God as described by most theologians includes the attributes of omniscience (infinite knowledge), omnipotence (unlimited power), omnipresence (present everywhere), divine simplicity, and as having an eternal and necessary existence.
ohaz has written
Dude. The bible was written a few thousand years ago, was poorly translated and has been passed on by speech only for hundreds of years before that. Language didn't even have that many words back then. Of course there are going to be some mistakes in it. Where's the problem? Nobody cares about some single sentences - the important part about religion is the big picture behind it (in case of Christianity it's Altruism and Charity.
But you can be altruistic, generous have goodwill if you belive in evolution. The thing is that most people who belive in creation are religious and who dosen't aren't.
I, myself, am agnostic, but I'd happily convert to absolutely any kind of religion if good evidence is brought. Not atheists have to prove theists god dosen't exist, it's vice-versa.
Please note that this is just an example and its not the reality or my opinion about creation or evolution so dont start to think that im on the science nor the religion side.
@ Yates: how should we even evolve from a fish to a human being. thats just completly impossible, even after billion of years. did u even look at the human body? even after thousands years, we still dont understand how we completly work. everything in our body is so complex.
but nvm, as u said, this should be closed.
That's some neat logic right there. 1+1=5 for you isn't it?
Seriously though, these two things don't even connect the slightest.
It can take a single kind of bacteria to spread meters in a few weeks and along the way more kind of bacteria are created from it.
There is actually a video on a similar test with bacteria somewhere, if I can find it, I'll post it here.
Hey look I found it within seconds:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/harvard-scientists-reveal-timelapse-footage-8816165
My point being, if bacteria can do that in what for us seems a small period, what can happen over a billion years is unimagineable!
Pehlivan has written
ye retarded logic what i really mean is like sth. so complex, like our bodies, couldnt just evolve from a smaller organisim to what we are now.
i just want to use this as an example
'Sperm' what is it?
where has each generation come from?
if humans can come from a single sperm cell; humans can certainly have come from a single bacteria cell over billions of years.
but of course, sperm doesn't exist does it?
Albert Einstein has written
Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind.
edited 3×, last 18.12.16 05:20:49 pm
In other words, it is self-deception for peoples, ...nothing...trash.
So in this thread it is not offtopic.
Admin/mod comment
§3.1 - No posts which offend/provoke/insult (flame) Alpha Beta has written
The atheist regimes had a death toll of 50+ million people.
srsly
pls
close this
@ Pagyra:
is right; iv no intention to flame on anyone, or use any spite on them; but as far as we are aware with all modern sciences; non of the religions we know today (if any) could possibly exist due to them being completely contradicted by modern sciences.
being agnostic; il be certain to pick a side had it had a logical background (but sadly they dont.)
While the idea of a bigbang is still as logic-less as a god existing; one will have had to exist for one to exist.... so... the start of the universe is a contradiction in its own right.
long story short; unfortunately the bible, kuran, torah, and modern adaptable religious texts alike are fictional (as much as i hate to admit it.)
they follow the lives of some; but they use the complete and utter fiction in others. (frankly its 95% the latter)
The enormous complexity of the physical world is a strong argument for a creator. Even Einstein realized this.
Even if you don't believe in a religion, you can still believe in a God. Pantheism or deism are reasonable.
did you not read what i just wrote?
modern sciences contradict religion due to it proving all forbearing "history" in the books as false; there was no adam and eve, no garden of eden; the world has always been as harsh as it has always been.