On 3rr0r's standstill problem. I'm going to work out an alternative solution to keep pointing integrity and to avoid standstills:
http://tgvserver.info/forums/showthread.php?t=160
Alternative Solution: Reduce the round time to something lower to also avoid standstills. (When time runs out, the kill goes to the winning team)
Hope this will solve the issue of a deadlock game.
On the voluntariness of the FOW, the default FOW setting will be turned on but can be turned off if both parties consent. Anyways, we did initially plan to mandate FOW only but most of the people have split opinions so we agreed to let the players work it out themselves.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ILLECTRO has written
Oh lowl-iam just laughing everytime about ya american thinking.Does it matter if you have won in Ct 5:0 or 8:0(includes 1 bomb defuse).Its just important how many rounds youve won not your points...?*Statsplayers*?
I'm sorry, are you familiar with the whole concept of an open league or do I have to spell it out for you? The point system is entirely based upon the numbers of kills you make, and by points I mean frags only. If you distort the score by planting the bomb then it's not called a fair game.
Illectro, please read up on this topic:
http://tgvserver.info/forums/tgv-chat/152-circular-argumentum-prejudice.html
Same applies here, racial differentiation doesn't qualify as grounds for impacting. Thus your claims are to be discredited.
Quote
Tell me some tactics without bomb /hostages? Cmon! As i said no way to win just fragging lowl or run away-nice!
Okay, take the WCL, the PCL, and any professional gaming leagues, ask them if they would take in detonation as a valid objective if they use a ladder system based off of frags.
Quote
Or same with no fow,i guess when my opponent is refusing my question, i had to accept it and play with no fow.
My answer is what every american would reply to you:
Compromise
Search out Henry Clay. I don't hear him whining when he lost the elections 3 times.
Quote
Every child knows that a 1on1 is get played with fow & etc,it just makes you to do tactics and more.
I said you decided if you want to use FOW or not, please read b4 blatantly spilling out the first thing that comes to your mind.
Quote
No Fow/bomb/Hostages = Fragmatch(includes no tactics just shoot)
Then obviously you have no idea how to play the game without hiding behind bombs or hostages. Do you call that tactics?
Quote
My whole strenght is playing on Fow.
And imm sure you americans have probs with playin on fow ;]
Nevermind
Again, please read what I've actually posted because I've specified 4 different times on this topic that you can have FOW. You're being willingly ignorant.
Quote
greetz.... btw stop quoting everything and every statement,i guess in such a small topic it isnt needed.
Not if every assertion you make is based off of fallacies and you refuse to actually reason with valid points. I'll give you a roadmap of the argument you've just made:
Assertion: You must enable fow, bomb, and hostage
Reason:
1. You can't think of any tactics to play without enabling bomb/hostage
2. You claim that we're advocating no fow. Objectively false
3. You completely ignore the "working it out with the challenger" part of the solution.
3b. Implies you have absolutely no skills in compromising
4. Fallacy on red herring. Subjective stating that "children" considers lack of these components to be a "frag match"
4b. Definition of a frag: a Kill. Primary objective of any cs2d round: Killing opponents. Conclusion: Your claim makes no impact whatsoever
5. You make the claim that we're not listening to reason when you yourself refuse to rationalize nor argue with reason.
So good luck, I doubt anyone would miss your from the tourney. edited 4×, last 19.11.08 07:15:53 pm
CS2D 
2DMax League
Offline
